Kill Six Billion Demons: Tales of Ys-Aesma
Most of the side stories and bonus texts throughout volumes one and two of the comic purport to be in-universe documents and oral traditions. Some of them are attributed to specific authors, while others are anonymous. The former tend to be either about recent, verifiable history, or explaining technical things about the rules of magic and Throne society and so forth. The latter are written more like rumor or mythology, and often concern the doings of Yisun and their seven and a half hundred thousand grandchildren. One of the most frequently occurring names in these mythical tales is that of Ys-Aesma; the chaotic goddess of want, struggle, and aspiration, and the creator of humanity.
In the comic itself, Aesma's name has come up in the context of prayers, incantations, and angelic exposition. Presumably her petrified body is one of the many buildings of modern Throne, and one of the 777,777 universes is of her voice. Of course, her influence on the multiverse is far greater than most of her siblings', due to her having created the most seemingly prolific of the Inheritor races.
Many of these stories contradict each other, and in ways that don't suggest Yisunian paradox so much as conflicting accounts. Given their mythic tone, and the obvious in-universe cultural flourishes attached to some, it's possible that none of these tales are meant to be taken literally at all. The story that prompted this post, "Aesma and the Red-Eyed King," co-occured with Mottom's autobiography and the Hastet-Om reveal. To properly understand that story though, there are some earlier Aesma-focused ones that you're expected to have read first. One of which actually has a lot of light to shed on the setting as a whole, assuming it's anywhere close to the truth.
I'll start with that one; it's an expansion on part of the creation myth we got from White Chain, and it makes no secret of its in-universe origin. What that origin says of its credibility is open to debate.
Yup! It's the origins of sapient life according to the devils. Or at least, according to one specific group of devils. A race of disorganized mercenaries, criminals, and adventurers who periodically lose their memories via demasking is going to be pretty culturally diverse, so they likely have many versions of these stories.
Koss, as you may recall, is the god credited with creating the angels and instilling them with the Law. Earlier, I mused that he might also have (intentionally or otherwise) given the angels their masculine biases.
We've never heard about gods fighting gods before. Granted, at 777,777 their population was easily large enough to have full-on wars between divine city states, so it's hardly implausible. On the other hand, this is a diabolical take on an already not-necessarily-literal story, and devils seem the types to add violence to every story. Even if not all of them are as professional and up-front about it as Cio.
It notably doesn't say which side in the war Koss was playing Hephaestus for. Either way, he seems to not have much choice in the matter. Sounds like he might be trying to fit in amongst a group of jock war gods by making stuff for them, but they'll never truly accept a non-jock. Koss should have made new friends. Not all 777,776 of his brothers and sisters could have been such philistines.
Anyway, he did the divine equivalent of pulling a back muscle while making weapons for the jock pantheon(s), and decided he needed to....well, not to stop, or to stand up for himself, but to find a way to lessen the workload. Apparently the corpses of Ys and Un had been left behind somewhere and petrified too when they produced their offspring. Are those bodies in Throne, or somewhere else? Unclear, but it sounds like somewhere else.
The white flame of angelkind is *definitely* getting described differently in this account. When White Chain and Michael talked about the white flame, the emphasis was on the light it produced, with the coldness framed as a benign property; it performs useful work, and demands nothing in return. Here, the cold is described as not just a lack of consumption, but an active chilling effect on everything close.
You can tell that this version was written by the angels' enemies. That doesn't mean it's further from the truth than the angelic version, necessarily, but it's a factor to take into account.
Heh, at least they're honest about being dishonest.~
That's probably where a good 40% of K6BDverse devils' charisma comes from, come to think of it. They all openly admit to being bastards, and own it magnificently.
Anyway, the white angel fire came from Un's eye, and the black devil fire came from Ys's tongue. Tongues are used for consumption, obviously. But I wonder if there might be more nuance in there. More often than feeding, tongues in literature are associated with speech. We've been told that the demiurgi learned a lot of new magic from devils, and devils have a lot of quirks related to speech (their ability to bestow universal speech on people who drink their pregnancy liquor, their strange dialect that somehow DOESN'T get accounted for by that universal comprehension ability, their rituals of names and rhymes, etc). Actually, if we broaden "speech" to mean "communication in general," then that would include writing, which ties into Cio's powerset.
Devils aren't just consumers and users. They're also, on an equally fundamental level, communicators. This accounts for (or is representative of) their more positive aspects, the impulses that let at least a few of them be more than just rapacious monsters.
The angel fire, meanwhile, came from an eye. Connotations there, at least in most cultures, are perception (obviously) and often also judgement. That second one is probably where the connection with the angels is going, but we'll see.
I'm pretty sure that this part is completely new.
Anyway, weak and sputtering, but also constantly trying to escape its constraints and expand wherever it can. That definitely sounds like humanity, particularly as this comic frames us. This milder, more manageable black flame comes from Ys's heart. Medically speaking, it's a vital function. Connotationally, emotions and desires. Humans are the feeling, and the wanting.
Servants, in their various flavors. I guess they're sort of angel-lite in the same way that humans are devil-lite? Cool white flame, watered down from the angelic chill. Just like humans are a lukewarm black flame, not burny like devils. The fingernail origins obviously ties to their nature and role as manual laborers.
This might be coincidence, but there seems to be a pattern of the more intense, "immortal" fires coming from the divine duo's heads, while the lesser flames used to make humans and servants come from elsewhere in their bodies. Maybe significant, maybe not. As for what angels and servants have in common, devils and humans have in common, and what traits either pair lacks from the other...well, perhaps we'll see.
Anyway, all four of these races only existing because a smith god wanted to impress his friends as part of some petty war that wasn't actually important is...something.
...I was going to say that maybe the white flame cares only for its surroundings while the black flame cares only for itself, but that apparently isn't the case.
So, here's what I suspect might be the most contentious aspect of the story in-universe. According to this version of the tale at least, the angels were originally created to be taskmasters and slave-catchers. That was their whole reason for existing, before they were repurposed into security for Throne in the gods' absence.
This might just be diabolical propaganda. I don't think anyone is still alive from that time besides the first generation of angels themselves, so I doubt it's verifiable. But, I don't think that it is. There are too many details that line up too well. The way that Michael danced around the question of Servant agency, despite us having seen specimens who are doing all sorts of lawful and unlawful things. Like he was avoiding even letting that subject be raised or thought about. The vagueness of what "the old Law" actually meant in practice. And, of course, the historical parallels with American policing. The degree to which American police had its origins in slave-catching has been exaggerated by some voices in recent times, but that was inarguably one of its major foundations. Given how much social commentary the author has already done with the angels, and the general slant of K6BD's politics, well...it fits. It could still be devilish lies, but I feel it most likely isn't.
This also recontextualizes Zoss' actions for a second time. When White Chain told the story of his conquest of Throne, she made it sound like his battle with the Prime Angels was the result of a misunderstanding. When Juggernaut Star and Michael revealed the secret of the Masterkey, Zoss (or at least young!Zoss) started looking much more like a power-hungry thug with the way he pursued them even after their avatars were disabled and forced Metatron to give him the secret names. But now, both versions of that story look like they might have been missing an important ingredient. Could a lone wizard - before he learned the secret names and gained even further knowledge from the devils - really have defeated a whole army of beings as powerful as Michael and Metatron? What if Zoss did a Cortez and led the Servants in an uprising (with or without the betrayal and enslavement afterward)? That plugs a LOT of holes in the story we've been presented with, and the omission would make total sense coming from angelic storytellers. If that's how it actually went down, then young!Zoss goes back to being a morally ambiguous figure who may have had some virtuous motives (or at least methods) as well as selfish ones.
I also like the double-edged comment about how Un-Koss was wise in not using the protohuman flame as his instrument. You could read that as "humans are dumb and weak and never would have been able to do what Koss wanted," or as "humans are clever and self-interested and would have just joined the Servants in their rebellion." Possibly both.
"Pree Ashma" is an alternate name for Ys-Aesma, who we've been waiting for this story to get to. "Pree" seems to be a female honorific on Throne, with "Preem" being its male counterpart. "Ashma" and "Aesma" are close enough to just be alternate spellings.
The instant Koss gets any recognition or respect, Aesma becomes jealous of him. The later stories will provide some insight into why that might have been.
Another backhanded complement, or perhaps fronthanded insult. The devils seem to have a grudging respect for humans. Or, perhaps, like Aesma herself they envy the positive attention that early humankind got from the gods.
Strange, that such a mild flame should burn so hot in its new, mortal state.
This also gives some new context to the devils themselves, and perhaps explains why they have such complicated feelings about humans. The demiurgi didn't just give the devils bodies and let them into Throne. They created them. Or, more specifically, they found the hot black tongue-flame in the void and invented masks that could extract parts of it and give them sentience as well as heat and hunger. This is why devils are so unstable, as we saw after the drinking contest; they're a human attempt at creating life from the fires of will, and thus flimsier than even Aesma's inexpert work.
It should be noted that Aesma actually did get what she wanted in this story. Her creations got more admiration from the other gods than Koss' did. As you're about to see, this is very much the exception to the rule for Ys-Aesma.
The next story is also right at the end of volume one, coming with Killy's decision to head back to Throne and live up to her name. This one is called "Aesma and the Three Masters (and the Lessons She Never Learned From Them)." The source for this one isn't given, but it appears to be from the written traditions of a human civilization that has been contacted/conquered by the demiurgi.
Yisun's speaking house is a recurring setting in these myths. Given that the gods do just about everything by means of speaking what they want into being (or the things they don't want into oblivion), a "speaking house" is an important place.
As in the previous story, the gods are extremely flawed and humanlike. To a slightly cartoonish degree, even, as is the way of some real life mythologies.
The "winds both interstellar and terrestrial" line is the first indication that this story comes from a scientifically literate culture. Until then, it could easily have come from a Bronze Age storyteller.
This is also where we get the first overt "take this story with a grain of salt" detail. The Kingsroad didn't exist until long after the gods had turned to stone; there was nowhere for it to lead to until then, after all. So, while this story might have some truth to it, it's been muddled with millennia worth of retellings and cultural distortions, resulting in some serious anachronisms at the very least.
The ending there is an obvious allusion to Zen Buddhism. "If you meet the Buddha on the road, you must kill him." Which seems like it should suit Aesma just fine.
And yeah, Aesma really is a twit. That devil storyteller before wasn't kidding when they said Aesma was a jerk.
This story is divided into sections, though it isn't quite as long as Het and the Rakshasa. This next chapter is called "Aesma and the Master of Space-time."
You just know the author has drawn this guy a whole bunch.
I'm not sure what this "illuminated consciousness" business is all about. Some kind of soul thing obviously, but no further details have been provided. Anyway, this guy has some impressive informational powers; Yisun seems to have meant it when they pointed to him as one of the three greatest of their grandchildren.
Kind of puts the lie to the Master's claims of perfect precognition. If he really knew the future form and state of all matter at all instances in time, he'd have known not to bother trying to build the Panopticon because he'd have foreseen its destruction.
Maybe there's an "unless acted upon by another god" limitation on his predictive powers.
Two ways of reading that "victory" of Aesma's, I suppose. One is, as I said, that the Master proved that he couldn't predict everything. The other, I guess, is that there is a certain level of brute force against which no amount of knowledge can make a difference. Whether that actually makes one "greater," of course, depends on how you measure greatness.
The following chapter is named for Aesma's next victim, the Master of Aesthetic.
Nice place. Reading this in retrospect, having gone through most of volume 2, it also reminds me a lot of the Palace of Radiance. Nadia or Hastet or whoever originally built the palace might have been inspired by legends of the Master of Aesthetics' estate.
Or hell, it could literally be the Master of Aesthetics' estate, if that got left sitting around after the gods turned to stone. Just stick some magitech engines on that thing and call it your capital.
There's also another reminder that this story probably isn't entirely literal, given what was and wasn't supposed to have existed yet with regards to mortals. The talk of computer code and so forth could mean that the gods actually did have computers back when they were physical, or it could be another case of the culture this version of the story comes from projecting aspects of their own era onto divine prehistory.
Ys-Aesma is a mighty goddess who can literally break the universe in half, but even she can't afford to pay twenty fucking dollars for a mocha and crescent.
More seriously, Aesma having to scavenge from cafes to get by is part of a recurring motif in her stories. She's often portrayed as simultaneously the weakest of the gods who can be cast out by unamused mortals with sticks, and the strongest of them who can defeat entire divine armies singlehandedly. Given the role that humans play in the K6BD setting, as simultaneously the weakest and most downtrodden (the serfs and slaves of the conquered worlds) and the most powerful and overwhelming (the demiurgi) beings of the contacted multiverse, you can see how Aesma is an appropriate mascot for us. Again, regardless of literal truth or lack thereof.
I like the Master of Aesthetics. Even if the cafes in her city are overpriced hipster hangouts.
Moreso than the Master of Spacetime, she also seems like she isn't even bragging here. Just stating a fact.
Okay, now she's bragging.
On one hand, I feel like the Master of Spacetime would be able to make some compelling arguments in his own defense if he were here in person. A debate between the god of art and the god of science would probably be fascinating to hear.
On the other...again, gods. For them, the line between material reality and subjective interpretation is a hell of a lot thinner than it is for us. I guess it depends on how much you want to anthropomorphize them for the purposes of this story.
Too bad she isn't the Master of Common Sense. If she was, she'd have known that this is not something one should say to Aesma.
It took her three days to get up off her ass and do something about this? I guess she's not the Master of Reflexes either. Anyway, like I said before, details like this make the story seem much less literal than it otherwise could have.
I'm not sure whether or not Aesma's "discovery" (really, more like the Master's discovery made by watching Aesma, who remained as clueless as ever) rings true to me. Violence could be argued to be the most basic form of communication, but I feel like art isn't exactly the same thing as that. Also, "violence" is such an incredibly broad spectrum of activities that calling it a universal art is almost like calling art itself a universal art. This part of the story feels like the most philosophically shaky one.
Next is the Master of Ethics. Things might go better for this one, but they probably won't.
The Master of Ethics is a very poor teacher, going by the assorted flavors of unpleasantness that were going on in his city even before Aesma came in with her usual flavor of cartoon violence.
I love the "law of dogs" thing, especially how it comes with no explanation at all. Like the reader is expected to already know about it. Details like this make it feel like a genuine foreign tale missing some of its cultural context.
Anyway, if your purity of heart determines how close to the Master you can get, then that explains the questionable practices and conduct of those on the periphery. Although, if he were truly a Master of Ethics, you'd think he'd be a little more proactive in helping them to be better.
Honestly, if I were Aesma I'd just declare this battle already won and walk away with a laugh. But then, one of Aesma's defining traits is that she is extremely stupid, so she might not have picked up on this failure of the alleged Master's.
I'm starting to think this is all a test, and the priests and pilgrims actors. I'm not sure if Aesma's solution was the intended one, though.
I'm surprised she didn't just do that in all the previous rooms, lol.
Note that this whole story started with Aesma already at Yisun's side. Lots of Zen Buddhist sensibilities in this story. "The path to enlightenment is the discovery that you already were enlightened to begin with," etc.
Taking moral credit for totally involuntary things lol.
The assertion that existence itself is unethical is one that I'd normally be sympathetic to, but the Master of Ethics' case seems like it should be an exception since they don't consume resources of any kind. This feels like style over substance, which seems to be the flaw of the Master of Ethics in general.
The emperor had no clothes.
Only this time, the child didn't point it out. She just kind of tripped over his nakedness in a way that made it obvious. Without noticing that she'd done it, even afterward.
It seems like the Master of Ethics' moral philosophy caused him to be completely passive. Not even paying attention to the people in his immediate surroundings. Which...does not seem ethical to me, honestly. He impresses me the least by far out of the three.
Blaming her for his self-perception being off. How very ethical.
This guy isn't the "master" of anything. His morals had never even been put to the test before now. He was no ethicist, he was a newborn baby.
And now, the final chapter of Aesma and the Three Masters.
So, that's "Aesma and the Three Masters." If you didn't read Yisun's lines in the last section in John de Lancie's voice, you're missing out.
The power of desire. Because of her self-defeating nature, Aesma's life is the most meaningful as Yisun sees things. After all, if existence is a lie, then isn't complacency or mastery a sort of just...not engaging with the story you're being told?
I'm not sure that I agree. If there isn't the possibility of progress and achievement, even if it's just minor ones in the grand scheme of things, then that also makes the lie fall flat. There's no meaning if there's no potential accomplishment. There's no real struggle if the prize is truly unattainable.
Making an effort to be more open minded, I guess I could see this as a journey versus destination dichotomy. Aesma never reaches her destination; thanks to her refusal to learn, she's perpetually on a journey. If she ever made it to the end, she'd stop being the Master of Want. Seeing her as an archetype rather than a person - the struggle toward a goal, independent of what the goal in question might be - makes it work better for me.
Though in that case, I'd have to take some issue with the Master of Spacetime's alleged besting. The Master of Aesthetic had declared her own journey over, which made her passive and static (maybe that's what the three day reaction time was hinting at). The Master of Ethics never even started his, and thought he didn't need to go on one. But the Master of Spacetime WAS struggling. There was something he wanted that he didn't have (the ability to see everything at one time). He was working on a big building project in pursuit of that goal. He *did* have Want, at least for the time being. So, I'm not sure what that part of the story is supposed to mean.
The main reason I included this story in the post is because it gives the most comprehensive look at who and what Aesma is. The Fool archetype, with a side order of Loki at his pettiest and most unpleasantly absurd. Actually, come to think of it, there are some permutations of the North American Coyote/Raven god that she's much closer to than Loki. Just ramp up the dickishness and add a dash of One Punch Man, and you'll get something pretty close to Yis-Aesma.
It's simultaneously unfair and completely fair of the story to use Aesma as a kind of sort of representation of Killy. They have some traits in common, but fortunately not too many.
Anyway, that brings us to the third and last story I wanted to cover. Like I said before, "Aesma and the Red Eyed King" comes along with the comic pages of Nadia introducing us to her husband. And, in this case, Aesma *isn't* playing an analogous role to Killy's. The style of this story is close to the Three Masters one, but it's much more sardonic and deconstructive in tone, as well as preachier. It reads like a more countercultural, revisionist myth from the same broad society.
This story is a bit longer, so I'll take it chapter by chapter like I did with the Het story.
Like I said, this feels as much like a parody of an Aesma myth as an actual Aesma myth. The other, shorter ones that have appeared here and there throughout the comic were less irreverent than this, usually being more like the Three Masters story.
The story is also very heavyhanded with its attack on patriarchy. The other Aesma myths seemed to assume a more or less egalitarian default as far as gender is concerned. Here, Aesma is being led astray (as she is wont) by assertions of what makes a proper woman. The authority figures are all explicitly male, and their maleness and authority are distinctly associated. Contrast this with the last story, where hermaphrodism seems to be considered the godly ideal. It feels like the in-universe author is criticizing their own society through allegory.
Aesma starting the story by looking for something to drink might be meaningful, given that this story came with a Mottom scene. That consumption motif. And the pursuit of consumption leading to a husband...well, that last bit is an inversion of Mottom's story, at least to hear her tell it, but close enough.
I don't know what the "Ten Yondam" suffix means. I don't think I've seen it before, attached to Aesma's name or any other. Her stick-fighting skills are also even more inconsistent than usual in this tale. She was practically designed to troll Versus Debaters with.
Also, there's lots of weird dog-related turns of phrase and superstitions in these stories. Hmm.
Next chapter.
Can I just say that I loved the confrontation between Aesma and the guards? Both the "oh, never mind, the ruinous evil being approaching is just Aesma again" part, and the "too complicated, I'll fight you instead" thing.
It seems like the best way to get rid of Aesma is to just give her something else to do. Tell her about some other shiny thing on the other side of the cosmos, and if you phrase it the right way she'll forget all about what she was destroying your city for and go be someone else's problem. That makes sense for a goddess of want and struggle. Unfortunately, the guards of the Crucible laid it on a little too thick.
Given the heavyhanded second wave feminist vibe of this story, I wonder if the part about them not taking Aesma seriously as a powerful evil being is also saying something. Why isn't she already in that damned prison herself? Infantilization of women, etc.
The description of the Red Eyed King with his dark, burning hunger sounds very devil-influenced. Though of course, if there is any literal truth to this tale then those events would have long predated the existence of devils. Unless that devil creation story was also wrong, of course.
Preachy, in all the ways that a bunch of 70's-80's vintage feminist parables I've read were. The fictional historical context that this version of this story was written in would really interest me to know. It's also a testament to the real life author's skill that I'm attributing this to his fictional counterpart rather than himself. Moving on.
The "make of thee a beast I can mount" part is what really made the applicability of this story to the comic clear to me. It's just that the framing of the "marriage" threw me off at first.
It's not a paralel to Nadia's first meeting withy Hastet. Nadia's account of how he married her may or may not be entirely truthful, but it's the only version we've got, and it doesn't match this Aesma story at all. What it DOES parallel is Nadia's second "marriage" to her late husband, in his new form with new things to offer. The fruit of immortality making their way into the story in some capacity was a nice touch.
In the beginning, Aesma is thirsty and exhausted. That's elderly Mottom, who's just killed or transformed Hastet. She has immense power, including the ability to carry the tree around on a palace-ship powered by her will (a beast he can mount), but she's been conditioned to fear and hate her own aging, and is looking for something to quench that need for youth. The buried, evil thing underground can be raised up to give her what she thinks she needs, but only if she plunders the universe to feed and fatten it. It's her power doing all the heavy lifting, but he's the one calling the shots. A multiversal kingdom ruled by a stomach and administrated by a goddess who has nothing better to do than feed it.
The priests' denial of Aesma's guilt and culpability for her many misdeeds correlates pretty well with Mottom's victim complex. She blames Hastet for what she's become, even though she has agency and he in his tree form really doesn't.
Well. Aesma actually did learn something this time, though it might not have stuck.
Mottom gets slapped by Killy on the same page where this last chapter appears. Unfortunately, it didn't seem to have snapped her out of it. Granted, in the Aesma story "one hundred days as a scullery maid" is still very much a downplaying of Aesma's culpability. She chose to be the Red Eyed King's tool. She knew what he was using her to do. When he displeased her personally, she stopped. Aesma is not the victim in this story. Or at least, not mostly.
It also relates to the "grand enemy called I" concept. Defeating the Red Eyed King in combat was never the dramatic question. The question was if Aesma would decide to. Really, with all of his power coming from her efforts, you could say that he was more just an extension of her than anything else.
Killy rejects the offer outright, mirroring Aesma's triumph without having to cause the damage that preceded it. Mottom caused the damage, and I don't think she'd going to have learned anything good. Like Zoss said, you can always choose to not do what you've been told and conditioned to do; that's what distinguishes true Royalty.