“Polaris”
"Polaris" was printed in the first-ever issue of a publication called The Philosopher. I can't find anything else about this magazine, just that it once published a Lovecraft story, so I guess it didn't last very long after that. I know absolutely nothing about this story, except that its apparently racist against Inuit...which means the tribes from my birthplace would probably love it, as the Inuit were their bitter enemies.
Malevolent stars twinkle fiendishly down through the hellishly clear autumn night. A cool, horrid breeze sweeps across detestable rolling hills and hideous mangrove trees, in which demonaical songbirds sleep with their heads tucked in obscene cuteness beneath their tenebrous wings. Across the cursed hillsides, horrid bunny-rabbits writhe forth from their cthonian burrows to cavort and dance horribly in the hellish starlight.
Every one in a while Lovecraft will describe a forest or mountain as beautiful, but usually when he describes the scenery you get the impression that this guy really hated nature.
Fun fact; in the folklore of the very Alaska Natives who this story is said to treat badly, the aurora borealis is malevolent, and dangerous to humans. Lovecraft at least has some mythological precedent here.
And then we're right back to the eye-rolling descriptions, with "ghastly marble" being a particular stinker. What does "ghastly" marble look like? Have any of you ever seen marble that wasn't nice to look at? Lovecraft doesn't say what's wrong with the marble this city is made of, just that its bad and we shouldn't like it. Maybe he wanted ghastly to mean "pale white," but still, what a weird word to use. Then, after establishing that the city is made of marble, we're then told that "in the marble streets were marble pillars." THERE'S SO MUCH MARBLE U GAIS.
In terms of prose quality, this story is not off to a good start.
Okay, getting better.
The inhabitants of the city are described in positive terms, and the language that the narrator understands despite not knowing it is similar to the one the sailors speak in "The White Ship." Since the narrator is seeing this city in his dreams, I think its possible - perhaps even intended - that this is the same language, and that the city he saw is in Sona-Nyl or one of the other dream countries from that story.
He still describes the stars and landscape around the city, and to same extent the city itself, in dissonantly negative terms. I'm reminded a little of "Nyarlathotep" with the city turning against its inhabitants along with the natural world. Maybe he's getting at something similar here.
...and then a totally redundant soliloquy. So much for the writing getting better.
So a bit like "Beyond the Wall of Sleep," the protagonist is living two lives, a (presumably American?) man on Earth, and a citizen of a kingdom called Lomar, which I guess is in a part of the Dreamlands we haven't been to yet. The Lomarese are being slowly conquered by invaders called Inutos, who's description as "squat" and "yellow skinned" does unfortunately bring to mind the similarly-named Inuit. If Lomar is in the Dreamlands though, I'm not sure if they could really be Inuit. Maybe they're descended from Inuit immigrants to the Dreamlands, or are the manifestations of Inuit dreamers just as the narrator is manifesting as a Lomarese man.
Well, I guess if I really wanted to give Lovecraft the benefit of the doubt, the description of the Inutos as savage fiends and "creatures" would be fitting for someone from a society at war with them that's probably been circulating propaganda against the enemy for years. On the other...the Inuit were, as far as history can tell, never numerous enough or warlike enough to raise a conquering army. Their raids against the Athabascan and Tongass tribes to the south could be quite brutal, but these were small smash-and-grab operations that usually consisted of no more than a few dozen warriors, and the southern tribes did exactly the same thing to them (Alaska was a fairly violent place all around). They probably never even had the population required for a Ghengis Khan style horde like the one the narrator is describing.
What bothers me even more than the description of the Inutos, though, is that of the Lomarese. Noble, honorbound warriors, doomed because they're too chivalrous to fight the savages on their own level? That's a textbook ur-fascist narrative. "Our great society of the past was brought down by disgusting foreigners, who beat us even though we're totally superior to them because of some dirty trick that we in our purity and uprightness couldn't possibly think to defend against." It makes the Inuto description much, much worse in context.
I'm holding out hope that the Inutos aren't supposed to literally be Inuit, but I'm not optimistic.
Dream-narrator's friend is a high ranking Lomarese general, and he's about to fight the final battle to defend Olathoe, which is implied to be their capital city. Dream-narrator's poor health precludes him from being a soldier (autobiographical? Lovecraft was sickly as a youth, and may have avoided conscription for that reason. Also like the character, he was passionate about obscure ancient writings) so they put him on a watch tower where he can use his keen vision.
There's a detail here that might be redemptive for the story. The dream-narrator nonchalantly mentions how in the past, to escape the advancing ice sheets, his ancestors slaughtered a society of humans or other sophonts called "gnophkehs" that got in their way. I'm reminded of "The Doom that Came to Sarnath," in which Lovecraft clearly meant for the reader to condemn their Sarnathi for having done something similar to this. So, maybe the character's dehumanization of the Inutos is meant, from a Doylistic standpoint, to be nothing but the jingoistic bluster of yet another hypocritical imperial society? If it hadn't been for "Sarnath" I'd take the narrator's words at face value when he describes the gnophkehs as cannibalistic monsters, but after reading that earlier story...I dunno, its much more ambiguous because of that.
Also, the Pnakotic Manuscripts get what I think is their first mention in Lovecraft's fiction. While they won't turn up as often as the Necronomicon, they'll still recur throughout the mythos.
Master Choung's butterfly again, but this time instead of star monsters fighting over some unspoken grudge the dreamer wants to get back to a conflict between other humans or humanlike creatures.
Now. As for that poem.
"Six and twenty-thousand years" has to be a reference to the Milankovitch cycles. Earth's orbit is stable, but it goes through predictable cycles of wobbling, tilting, and orbital fluctuation. 26,000 years is the amount of time it takes for a complete precessionary cycle, which refers to the earth's polar orientation relative to the sun. As this cycle moves along, the stars appear to change their positions in the sky before moving back to where they were; Polaris, the North Star, wouldn't have been in the north thirteen millennia ago.
What the poem seems to be saying is that the war for Lomar will be forgotten until a complete precessionary cycle has passed and Polaris is back at the same spot in the sky that it was in at the time, at which point the narrator - in his modern reincarnation/dreamself/wakingself/whatever - will recall his other life.
That means that this story isn't set in the Dreamlands at all. Its set on Earth, during a prehistoric civilized epoch, and the reference to advancing ice sheets and the aurora borealis places it somewhere near the arctic.
That means that...
Oh.
God fucking damnit, Howie.
Oh fuck you.
And, thank god, its ends with that.
I've had an unwritten story idea in mind for many years, inspired by Hindu fairy tales and perhaps subconsciously by some of Lovecraft's other stories, about a child who dreams that he's the brilliant commander of an alien army, defending his homeworld from an invading swarm of mindless space locusts. The story ends with him being so disturbed by his dreams that he starts taking drugs and therapy to prevent them, and thousands of years later the ruined homeworld of that species is discovered by human explorers, stripped of all life by the locusts after the natives' brilliant tactician leader died in his sleep.
Right now, I don't just feel lame that such a similar story has already been done. I feel insulted.
Its virtually impossible to read this story any way besides "the Inuit are the descendants of a marauding orc horde who destroyed the sophisticated, civilized (and implicitly white) natives of northern Alaska before disbanding into little hunter gatherer tribes who aren't putting the land they conquered to any worthy use." Historical context makes this much worse than garden-variety racism. This story is a justification for why the Native Americans deserved to be slaughtered and driven off their land to make room for white settlers. Its a usurpation myth. Of course, Lovecraft completely ignores the factors that made Inuit society so threadbare and primitive; the harsh climate that minmized leisure time, the lack of quality materials with which to invent better tools, and the hostile tribes to the south that prevented the Inuit from using the rich forests there to supplement their resources. No, in this story, the Inuit are innately barbaric subhumans who destroyed the true and vastly superior natives (somehow) and then reduced themselves to tribal hunter-gatherers for want of any more white people to unite against.
How hard would it have been to say that the Inuit are the descendants of Lomar? That after the catastrophe for which the narrator may or may not bear partial responsibility, their cities were destroyed, their once-fertile farmlands covered in ice, and the few survivors turned to hunting and gathering to survive in the new and harsh conditions and eventually regressed into an illiterate tribal society? That still could be a bit of a dick move, making up a fictional prehistory for a group of people historically disadvantaged by your own that might not want it, but it would be worlds better than this pseudo-fantastical love letter to General Custer. This story reads like Lovecraft's apology for "The Doom that Came to Sarnath." Why couldn't he have apologized for "Dagon" instead?
The next story on the list, and the last one published in 1920, is "The Street." I'm not feeling very optimistic right now.