“Poetry and the Gods”
This story, it seems, is actually not solely a Lovecraft creation. HPL collaborated with another United Amateur author named Anna Crofts, schoolteacher, poet, and classicist. Sadly, the full nature of Lovecraft's relationship with Crofts is unknown, as none of his letters mention her and she left a very scant paper trail herself; some Lovecraft scholars even believed she was a pseudonym until her graduation and obituary documents were found. Our only artifact of her possible friendship with Lovecraft is this one story they wrote together in the summer of 1920.
The opening words are oddly similar to 1984's. The rest seems fairly typical Lovecraft, but there are some words that stick out as ones he doesn't normally use. "Wishes." "Yearnings." I'm guessing both he and Crofts went over each other's work and reworded/edited it to make their prose fit together more seamlessly.
I'm now convinced that my suspicion is correct. This reads like a perfect blend of Lovecraft and NotLovecraft prose. Every time it starts to feel like a sensitive suburban drama, there's suddenly some household object being compared to an ancient shrine, or depressing poetry emitting a chill vapour. Whenever it starts to feel like a Lovecraft story, we suddenly switch to low-cut evening dresses and an imaginative girl struggling with her ennui.
I also can't help but notice that Marcia is our first female protagonist after ten stories. Apparently, Lovecraft needed a cowriter - and perhaps even a female cowriter specifically - to badger him into writing about anything besides educated and semi-neurotic white guys.
Also, some mood music for a young romantic frustrated with her bland modern life:
Well, I think we've discovered why Anna Crofts isn't remembered as a great writer. Lovecraft's prose is bloated and often clumsy, but even he normally knew better than to use "X or Y" in repetition like that. I'm laying the blame for this on Crofts until I see Lovecraft turn that bad a phrase on his own.
Well, we're back in Lovecraft territory now. Let's see this amazing poem of inauspicious origins.
Hey, that's really not bad!
I'm not sure how the meter is supposed to work, so I can't read it melodically, but the words themselves are beautifully chosen and the metaphors and symbolism clever. The image of opening, white petals and reference to "insect flute music" should ring true to anyone who's been in a tropical rainforest at night. The Chinese stanza comes across as derisive at first, but in historical perspective it actually works very well: at the time this poem was written China was at a very low point, the proud national spirit beaten down and humiliated by British and American domination, socially stagnated, poor, and demoralized, with communist and nationalist firebrands just starting to wake up and shake off the malaise. The "weary moon" and "rotting temples" speak well to a once mighty empire now rendered poor and ineffectual.
The word "moon" was used a little too often, especially in the Japan stanza, but otherwise this is a pretty nice poem. Wonder who had more of a hand in writing it?
Eh, don't get your hopes up Marcia. You found one poem that you liked. For all you know, it might be the last one for a long time. You're setting yourself up for disappointment.
She recites bits of the poem to herself again while falling asleep, and then
Well, that escalated quickly. Marcia now has Hermes in her room. I guess she should be grateful it wasn't Zeus on one of his magical rape adventures.
Say what you want about Levantine gods like Dagon and their associated sacrificial rites, but from a Watsonian perspective, within the world of the myths themselves, I can't think of a single pantheon I hate more than the Olympians. Even the fucking Sumerian gods weren't quite that randomly dickish.
Marcia is HAWT, at least in Hermes' opinion. I keep getting more and more glad that it wasn't Zeus. Though I suppose Hermes could be talking about her spiritual, rather than physical, qualities; that would make more sense, since it was apparently her appreciation of the poem that got his attention.
The Olympians here seem to represent humanity's sense of fascination, wonder, imagination, and positivity. That's an awfully generous treatment of them, but I can kind of see the connection. The Greek gods and the various spirits and monsters that served them were seen to be one with the natural world, and added a dimension of mystery and magic - even if it often wasn't nice magic - to the material universe. And Hermes even specifies in the story that they're going to try their bests not to be assholes this time.
So, Hermes is interacting with Marcia's dream-self, then? When he gave that speech was he talking to her unconscious body, or was he appearing in her dream so that she could hear him? The text could have been more clear about that.
The description of Zeus' true throne on Olympus being deadly to mortals because of its divine radiance is strongly reminiscent of the Abrahamic god, who's radiance and voice are supposed to vaporize humans who see/hear it at full strength. According to some Christian (and I believe Muslim?) schools of thought, the fires of hell are not a separate place, but rather what happens to you if your soul is impure and sinful when god's light touches it, while the virtuous are unharmed by it. I don't know if the Greeks had a similar concept that the authors are drawing from, or if they're just projecting Judeo-Christian ideas onto Zeus.
It seems that the gods have recruited some of the greatest writers in the last three thousand years of western history into their ranks, though its skewed heavily toward post-renaissance Europe. Looks like Dan Simmons was only the second scifi author to turn John Keats into an immortal semi-divine Gary Stue.
Never shutting up seems to be an Olympian trait.
What I was able to decipher through that endless wall of pompous mythological references is that the gods are planning to return amid a resurgence in human art, poetry, and appreciation for beauty, and Marcia has been chosen to lead this cultural revolution.
I'm going to assume these are all quoted from the authors named, though I was only able to source the Keates one via google. They're either giving Marcia their own words of encouragement, or endowing her with their own powers or talents.
"False faiths" I'm pretty sure is referring to materialism, modernism, capitalism, etc. Not Christianity and Buddhism and so forth.
And, finally, its over. That felt like much longer than it was.
I think this story captures an interesting piece of the zeitgeist, leading into the twentieth century Romantic resurgence and eventually postmodernism, and illustrating the backlash against rationalism and materialism in the wake of World War One.
Unfortunately, its also the most pretentious, self-indulgent, self-aggrandizing, overstated, pseudo-sophisticated gust of hot air I've ever had to sit through outside of that one time I was forced to listen to high schoolers' poetry. The message is good, and the writing is strong in some places, but the realization of the concept has all the dignity of an eighteen year old hipster lecturing you about whatever smart-sounding arcana he looked up on wikipedia most recently, smug shit-eating grin splitting his face from ear to ear.
The story isn't bad enough to laugh at, like "Dagon" or "The Statement of Randolph Carter." Its just tiring, and headache-inducing, and I'm glad that its over. I went into this one intrigued by Anna Crofts and the effect she might have had on Lovecraft's writing, but if this slog was the result I'm just glad they didn't collaborate again after this.
At least the poem was nice.
Fortunately, our next story should be a much better reading experience: November 1920's "The Cats of Ulthar." :3