“The Alchemist"
At long last, I’m getting around to backfilling my complete Let’s Read of H.P. Lovecraft’s works onto this site. I went through most of them in publication order, with a few exceptions. For those who already followed this readthrough on Sufficient Velocity or Patreon, I’ll also be editing and polishing the early posts up a bit.
1908 was the year Lovecraft finished high school, but what he would later describe as a "nervous breakdown" prevented him from picking up his diploma. Its not clear what caused this breakdown, but Lovecraft's teens had not been pleasant. Four years earlier, his grandfather - himself a frustrated gothic fiction writer who encouraged Lovecraft's literary inclinations - had died, and mismanagement of the estate left the family in relative poverty. Shortly after that death, Lovecraft and his long-widowed mother were forced to move into a small apartment in a less upscale neighborhood of Providence. Lovecraft was something of a prodigy when it came to reading, writing, and memorization, but he struggled in math and other abstract subjects, which proved an obstacle at school. His social life was likely poor. I don't know if he wrote “The Alchemist” before or after this psychotic event, but either way it must have been at around the same time.
Notably, while this story was written in 1908, it wasn't published until eight years later in November of 1916. What I'm about to read was likely edited considerably between these two dates, and possibly rewritten (though Lovecraft's notes suggest that the changes weren't THAT drastic).
The Alchemist is also a story I not only haven't read before, but I hadn't even heard of until the other day when I started researching for this readthrough. I'll be going into this one completely blind.
Well, that was somewhat unexpected. We're in France, talking about a majestic castle who's architecture isn't described as foreboding. Lovecraft was a bit more flexible than he’s often thought of, at least in his early career.
Ahhh, that's more like it. Worm-eating, decay, obscure technical words that I need to google, this is more familiar.
I don't want to be one of those hipsters who tries to psychoanalyze everything (Message from 2020 Leila: I retroactively take back this apology. Lovecraft is impossible to not psychoanalyze when you read him. His works are a high-yield laser guided missile targeted at the Death of the Author principle), but the parallels here are pretty damned hard to ignore, especially considering the pride that the Lovecrafts placed on their heritage as descendants of the first wave of New England colonists post-Mayflower. The young lord in this story bemoaning the mismanagement of his family's historic estate...its hard to imagine young Lovecraft NOT seeing himself along these lines.
Yeah, the parallels aren't exactly getting more subtle. At this point I'd put my money on this character being deliberately autobiographical.
This is turning out to be much more similar to his later works than it seemed at first. We have many of Lovecraft's trademark elements: a noble lineage fallen into disgrace, superstitious peasants who fear and tell dark stories about them, hereditary curses or taints, and the young scion who must confront the eerie mystery of his ancestors. All we're still missing are the mad scientists, uncomfortably racialized pagan cultists, and tentacle monsters.
Interesting; plotwise, this is like a million other Lovecraft stories, but the way its written gives it a very different tone. Being burdened with the family secret on your birthday by a loyal servant or mentor is a high fantasy trope, not a horror one. Likewise, the bad guy (at least, I'm assuming Mauvais is the bad guy) is openly described as a wizard from early on in the story; no beating around the bush or purple prosed implications.
I have to wonder what our hero's ancestors were thinking by letting this guy operate in their fiefdom. It sounds like his crimes were well known to the locals, and wizard or not the guy was also a serial killer. Sounds like the Comtes de C-, at least at that time, weren't the most responsible lords.
The authorities accost and kill a creepy old country sorcerer...and he turns out to have been innocent? Man, Howard, what happened to you after you wrote this that turned you into a self-righteous authoritarian? This is much more nuanced than I'd have ever expected, and even casts some doubt on the earlier account of Mauvais having killed his wife and those children; if he was falsely suspected of this crime, who's to say he isn't also innocent of those others?
I have to wonder about Charles' spell there. What are the odds that he would just happen to have a potion on hand that does such a specifically karmic thing? Did he come up with that rhyme on the spot? If so...well, its better than I could do at such short notice, but the meter doesn't fit at all. And the word choice...he specifies "noble?" What happens if the family loses its holdings and titles? Will the curse be lifted once they stop being noblemen? This whole curse feels unconvincing and cliched.
Supernatural curse, or tragic consequence of hunting with Dick Cheney?
I'm guessing that doesn't include the human sacrifices. Though of course, as mentioned, those might have been a lie to begin with.
I find myself wondering when exactly this story is set. It seems like it must be earlier than Lovecraft's time, so "modern science" could mean just about anything. Honestly, the way this story is written I have an easier time imagining it set in some fantasy kingdom than in modern-ish France.
The subject matter has definitely gotten more haunting. Being told you have a finite lifespan, and knowing EXACTLY when it will end, god that must be depressing. This is hardly a new idea, it dates back in folklore and mythology for millennia, but something about this story makes it hit harder than usual. Part of it might just be that Antoine is a fairly likable character so far.
Dawww, bats. :3
How big is this castle, for parts of it to have gone completely untouched for four hundred years? Once again, my mental image is more like something from Westeros than any realistically sized castle.
I wonder if he'll think of abdicating his estate like I mentioned before, to make himself a non-noble? It seems like the most obvious loophole in the curse.
So, we're in his final year. Very paranoia inducing. His resolve to meet death on his feet and fighting seems a little unconvincing, though. His prose and his implied lifestyle don't suggest a man of action at all. I wonder if this was intentional on Lovecraft's part, or just a failed attempt at writing a sincerely active and physical character who ended up sounding too much like his shy, bookish creator.
...and holy wall-o-text, Batman.
This would be a pretty spine-tingling scene if it were written differently. Its hard to make jump scares work in prose, but when the door creaked shut, I kinda startled. The scene really suffers from all being one endless paragraph; there are some obvious breaks in the action where it should have been divided.
The spookiness faded in the second half of the textwall. Simply summarizing the newcomer's speech sort of took me out of the story, and it’s summarized in too genial and erudite a way for the tension that this scene opened with. This really, really should have been written in dialogue, not only so the attacker gets to be scary in person, but also so we can see if Antoine was just bullshitting when he said he wouldn't meet death passively. Did he get in any words himself? Did he try to put on a brave face? The text leaves me completely in the dark on what the protagonist is actually DOING while the bad guy is making his rant.
Then there was that bizarre word choice in the "that debased form of Latin in use amongst the more learned men of the Middle Ages." In what was was the Latin of medieval scholars "debased?" How does Antoine know the difference anyway, has he learned any version of Latin besides this one? I have no idea what's being described to me here, which, again, takes me out of the story, which is a pity after that excellent intro.
I'm guessing the attacker is the immortal Charles le Sorcier, or a servant or child of his who was given the Lazarus Well to play in. Wonder why they never patented that shit? Seems like it would have been a more rewarding use of their time then sticking around a half-ruined castle and waiting for each generation of Comtes to reach killing age.
Good thing evil wizards are so flammable. Otherwise, he might have easily killed you while you were gasping on the floor like a fish after putting his robes out.
And that, apparently, is the end.
Was this supposed to be some kind of surprise twist? The story is called "The Alchemist." Immortality and the Philosopher's Stone were alluded to repeatedly. And honest to god, if Antoine already believes in curses, why is magical life extension so much harder to swallow? It definitely makes it darker; I can scarcely imagine the kind of sheer, stubborn hate that would keep someone living in hiding for centuries, ostensibly without human companionship, just to murder someone every three decades. But the way its written, it seems like the assassin's identity was meant to be a twist, and it was much too late for that. Then there's this very unconvincing detail of Charles regaining consciousness just long enough to explain everything for no reason...
I think the ending would have been much stronger if Antoine had simply deduced the story himself after killing Charles, and if the closing lines called attention not to the obvious (the dead guy is Charles), but to the sad implications of that, maybe Antoine's eyes lingering on the squalid centuries-old bed and cracked and stained alchemy flasks.
This story explores a lot of Lovecraft's favorite themes: sins of the fathers, an externally triggered loss of humanity, isolation and alienation, crumbling ruins that seek to bury the living as well as the dead, etc. The anticlimactic ending though - both in how strangely easy it was to defeat Charles, and the utter nonsurprise of the final "twist" - drags this story down considerably. I got the feeling that Lovecraft was relying heavily on cliches when he wrote the details of the wizard family, both earlier when Antoine was reading about them and during the final confrontation with Charles, which detracted from the otherwise solid atmosphere and characterization.
Considering Lovecraft was seventeen year old when he wrote this, though, its flaws are much more forgivable.
This story was published in The United Amateur, the magazine whose pages Lovecraft would grace most often until 1923, when he found a new patron in Weird Tales. The next item on the list was another United Amateur submission the next year (1917), and another story that I'd never heard of before starting this project: "A Reminiscence of Doctor Samuel Johnson."